Sunday, January 13, 2013

Making a case for American soccer

I've been thinking about this for awhile now.  As an American soccer fan, it seems that you are constantly being told what a bad state American soccer is in.  At best, people might say that it's not where it should be.  At worst, people say that American soccer is bad to the point of being unwatchable.  You are told on a regular basis that it's all garbage and you should be following European football instead. 

The most recent example of this, of course, is FIFA president Sepp Blatter's comments in his Al Jazeera interview.  Basically this amounted to "C'mon, you've had 18 years since the '94 World Cup in the US, you should be at the same point as other countries where professional leagues were started hundreds of years ago and football/soccer has always been more popular than it is in the US."  Now, the president of FIFA saying this takes it to a new level, but I've heard it all before.  Online, in person, at soccer games, you name it.  I've been at a Union game with a "fan" nearby saying the Union sucks and singing "Glory, glory, Man United."  Sure, the Union is by no means the best team in the MLS, and sure they gave up 4 goals in that game but they also came back to tie the game in probably the most exciting game I've ever watched live.  When Real Madrid came to play the Union at Lincoln Financial Field, I was sitting directly in front of a girl who felt the need to talk about how terrible the Union was every 2 seconds.  The Union lost that game 2-1, which I thought was pretty impressive - even though it was not Real Madrid in top form, they're still one of the top teams in the world and I see no shame in losing by 1 goal to the team they put out there.  Not to mention that the Union's one goal was this golazo by Michael Farfan:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTDhv7cakEA

My point here is, I've gotten very used to these types of comments, as probably most American soccer fans have.  I'm sure there are some fans out there who have a whole diatribe memorized that they can rattle off to anyone who makes any derogatory comments about American soccer: Attendance in MLS is growing steadily, games are selling out, we're building more and more soccer-specific stadiums, seeing more home grown player signings, etc. etc.  All of that makes for a perfectly valid response, but to me I think we should also be asking the question: Why do we need to compare American soccer to British football or Spanish football or any other country for that matter?  It seems ridiculous to me, given that these other countries have had successful professional leagues for a much longer time, and the soccer/football culture is so much more prevalent in these other countries.  To me, I'd rather look at American soccer as its own entity, rather than an attempt to re-create the European football leagues in America. 

This doesn't mean that I think American soccer is just fine the way it is right now.  I still expect the game in America to continue to improve and to see more American talent develop.  But I don't think it needs to strive to be the EPL or La Liga or Bundesliga or Serie A, or any other league you might choose.  By those measures, we would probably fail to be honest, even given many more years.  Although many American children grow up playing soccer, you don't hear a whole lot of them say they want to be a professional soccer player when they grow up.  And you hear even less say it as they get in to high school and college.  One reason for this is that other sports like baseball and football are just more popular, especially among American boys in high school and college.  Another reason is that there's not much comparison between the salary for a professional baseball or football player and a professional soccer player in America.  There are plenty of MLS players who make less than I do.  Look over to the UK, Spain, Italy, etc and it's a very different story in terms of the popularity, number of children growing up wanting to be a professional soccer/football player, and the salary the professionals are paid.  We can't expect to get the same results in America when the game is developing under completely different circumstances compared to other countries.  We do have to keep working, but I would argue that we should be working toward the best version of the American game, not just another version of European football.

What's more, I kind of like the soccer culture we have in America right now.  Yes, there's a part of me that's wants to  see soccer continue to get more popular.  But there's another part of me that likes that it has kind of an underground feeling.  You feel a sense of kinship when you meet another soccer fan.  When you go to an MLS game, it's a much more intimate setting compared to a football or baseball game.  It all feels like you're part of an exclusive club - except for the fact that no one is excluded.  But as much as I enjoy that and as much as I'd rather not see soccer enjoy widespread popularity in America for several reasons, I do want people to see that American soccer is not a lesser version of European soccer.  It is a work in progress, but one that has many merits of its own even in its developing phase.  I want people to see that we may not be all the way there yet, but we're moving in the right direction, and more importantly, in our own direction.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

rooting for the overdogs

The Game: MLS Cup 2012, LA Galaxy vs. Houston Dynamo, December 1, 2012
The Viewing Location(s): 1st Half: PPL Park Stadium Club, 2nd Half: My apartment
The Beer: Sierra Nevada Pale Ale

There were a lot of disappointments for me in the MLS Playoffs this year.  The first came before the playoffs even began.  On September 29th, the Philadelphia Union lost to the Columbus Crew, and the Union's slim chance to make the playoffs disappeared.  Not that I had high hopes to see the Union in the post-season this year, but still, it's just not as fun to watch the playoffs when you don't have a horse in the race.  So I decided to pick some new horses when the playoffs began in November.

If you don't follow MLS, you can see the MLS Cup Bracket here:

http://www.mlssoccer.com/mlscup/2012/schedule

With the Union being out of the playoffs, it wasn't easy for me to pick teams to root for...I've built up at least some amount of dislike for most other teams in the MLS over the course of watching them play against the Union.  But there are some teams I respect more than others.  My initial pick in the Eastern Conference was the New York Red Bulls.  Yes, they are probably the biggest rival of the Union.  However, former Union favorite (and a favorite of mine), Sebastien Le Toux, currently plays for the Red Bulls.  And whatever people may say about Thierry Henry, I have great respect for him as a player and I love to watch him play.  As a sidenote, I think it's unbelievable that his cornerkick-turned-goal did not win Goal of the Year (watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4myldOypqs). Unfortunately, as things stand right now, the Red Bulls may well be the worst team money can buy.  Not that they're a terrible team, or even a bad team.  It's simply that they have three of the highest-paid players in the league, including the highest-paid player in Thierry Henry, and they have only been mediocre this season.  It seems ridiculous that with players like Henry, LeToux, Kenny Cooper, and former EPL player Tim Cahill (to name just a few) that this team didn't make it to the final.  Given the season New York had had, I wasn't ready to place any bets on them to win, but I preferred them over DC United.  DC is also a Union rival, and I've built up a somewhat irrational but nonetheless strong dislike of Dwayne DeRosario.  In the end, though, even without DeRo, DC was the better team in this series.  DC can also thank Rafa Marquez, who appeared to be single-handedly throwing the series for them, most notably with an idiotic tackle that led to a second yellow-card and his ejection from the game (which erased the one man advantage NY had earned). 

With NY out, I switched to rooting for DC, who advanced to the Eastern Conference Championship against Houston.  Houston had ousted Sporting Kansas City, and that made me happy enough (I can't stand Jimmy Nielsen, KC's goalkeeper, a 30-something year old with bleached-blonde hair who can't ever seem to keep his tongue in his mouth).  But I'm not a big fan of Houston either - they knocked the Union out of the playoffs last year.  It only contributed to the misgivings I already had when Andre Hainault denied a goal-scoring opportunity but inexplicably was not red-carded (to paraphrase Alexi Lalas - "He's a ginger and I love him, but I can't defend him").  Given all the difficulties DC was going through, mostly with injuries, it seemed that Houston deserved to fall on some hard luck, but it never came and Houston advanced to the finals.

That brings us to the Western Conference.  From the beginning, I knew I was never going to root for the San Jose Earthquakes.   I will say that they had an amazing season and they deserve a lot of respect for what they were able to do this season.  Chris Wondolowski also deserves a huge amount of respect individually.  But I just can't root for any team that Steven Lenhart plays for.  1. He has ridiculous hair.  2. He plays dirty.  I can respect the results he gets for his team but not the way he gets them.  My feelings about the LA Galaxy in this year's playoffs were a bit more complicated.  The Galaxy are kind of comparable to the NY Yankees - they have a lot of money and are expected to win everything and they have a lot of people who hate them simply for that fact.  I have never hated the Galaxy, it's just that I find it boring to root for them.  That said, all that money pays for some incredible talent.  There's Beckham, Donovan, and Keane of course, but there's also Juninho, Gonzalez, and Magee.  It was striking to see what a different team the Galaxy was without Gonzalez for part of this year.  And Mike Magee to me is one of the unsung heroes of the Galaxy...I can never forget how he stepped in as goalkeeper when Donovan Ricketts broke his arm and then Josh Saunders was ejected when the Galaxy played San Jose last year.  Magee usually plays as a forward or midfielder, but he kept a clean sheet in goal for 47 minutes in that game.  And it wasn't for a lack of effort on San Jose's part.  Still, I was pulling for either the Seattle Sounders or Real Salt Lake in the Western Conference.  LA won the MLS Cup last year, so I wanted to root for another team.  But LA showed again why they are champions, and advanced to the final.

In the match up between Houston and LA, I was a little bit torn about whose side to take.  As I've explained above, I generally like the LA Galaxy despite the fact that they're overdogs.  I do not really like Houston, despite the fact that they are a very good team and they do it without all the money that teams like NY and LA have.  It seems it should have been an obvious choice for me to pick LA.  But I'm usually not really one to root for the overdogs (I've broken that rule for other teams of course, namely Barcelona).  In the end, I did choose LA.  The fact that this would be the last MLS game for David Beckham and possibly for Landon Donovan factored into this also.  However you feel about David Beckham, he has done a lot for the MLS and I felt that he deserved to exit as a champion.  Landon Donovan, too, has done a lot for American soccer.  Although I'm not a huge fan of his very public discussions about how he might retire after this year, if this is his last season with the Galaxy I don't begrudge him a trophy.

As for the actual game, I wasn't all that into it this year...I had picked my team but it was hard to get too excited to watch the same teams that played in the Cup final last year.    Still, it was a good game to watch.  And although most people still predicted the Galaxy would win, it had to be (and was) noted that this was a different Houston team from the one that played in the Cup final last year, with the most noted differences being the availability this year of Oscar Boniek Garcia and a healthy Brad Davis.  I think it added something extra too that this was a rematch and I'm sure that gave Houston a little extra fire.  In the first half, Houston definitely went at LA and looked good to possibly to win the game.  They scored first and did so at a great time too, shortly before the end of the first half.  Despite all the talk about Brad Davis, Boniek Garcia, and Will Bruin, I would argue that Calen Carr was the player causing  the most trouble for LA - even beyond the fact that he was the goal-scorer for Houston.  In fact, Davis, Garcia, and Bruin really didn't have much impact on the game at all.  And in the second half, Houston's luck finally broke, starting with an injury to Calen Carr that took him out of the game.  Without Carr, Houston just wasn't the same threat to LA that they were in the first half.  And once LA began scoring, starting with Gonzalez's header in the 60th minute, it always leading towards a Galaxy win.  Give Houston credit for a great effort, but I think this was always the Galaxy's game to win.  True, the next two Galaxy goals came as penalty kicks (scored by Donovan and Keane, respectively) rather than run-of-play goals, but they came from the offensive pressure that LA was putting on Houston for the majority of the second half.

And so it went that LA were crowned the champions for the second consecutive year.  Don't hate them for it.  They earned it.  Yes, they have always had an advantage in terms of the money they have to spend.  And yes, there's something to be said for a team like Houston that can find a way to get results even though they can't afford world-class players like Beckham, Donovan, and Keane.  But it's become clear after watching the Red Bulls this season that a championship team isn't built on money alone.  The Galaxy have shown that mutual understanding between players is just as important as individual talent.  Individual brilliance certainly plays a role in their dominance, but it is the way that the players work like the parts of a well-oiled machine that has made them champions two years in a row.  It may not have the drama and excitement of a victory for the underdogs, but it is no less deserving of respect and awe.







Tuesday, November 27, 2012

this is not for you

I know, no one has a blog anymore.  Blogs are out.  So why am I doing this?  Well, I'll start this out the way one of my favorite books (House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski) starts out: This is not for you.

In other words, this is for me.  I'm doing it completely on a whim and it may be very short-lived.  To explain why, I'm going to start at the beginning.  While my love of soccer, the "beautiful game," really began at a very young age (I played from about age 5-16), I'm going to skip ahead to 2010, which is when I started following both American and international soccer.  In the summer of 2010, I had just completed my Master's in Genetic Counseling and I was unemployed.  This was not my plan, but as it turned out, there was a silver lining to my otherwise miserable period of unemployment: it occurred during the 2010 World Cup.  And seeing as I didn't have much else to do (I could only spend so many hours job-hunting without losing my mind), one day I decided to turn on a World Cup match.  I had never really watched soccer before, I had always preferred to play.  But I was hooked instantly.  I couldn't get enough.  I watched every game I could, and when the World Cup was over, I wanted more.  The prospect of waiting four years for the next World Cup was unacceptable to me.  I decided to replace my World Cup addiction with Major League Soccer (MLS) and international soccer (mostly English Premier League (EPL), but also Spanish La Liga and German Bundesliga when I can catch them on TV, as well as some other international competitions like Champions League or Euros).

In short, that's how I became a soccer fan.  Soccer is probably as close to a real addiction as I will ever come.   Because of soccer, I willingly (and eagerly) wake up at 7am on Saturdays to watch EPL games (admittedly, this was a lot easier and more enjoyable when I was unemployed, but I still do it). Because of soccer, I make regular trips to Chester, PA between the months of March and October (if you're not familiar with Chester, count yourself lucky). I have yet to plan any crazy trips in the name of soccer, but I'm beginning to feel that it's only a matter of time (and saving enough money for said trips).

Finally, I'm getting to the point.  I really like my day job, but I have begun to daydream about how amazing it would be to combine two things I love (soccer and traveling) and get paid for it. I understand that this is dream is fairly unrealistic: I've taken the bare minimum of writing classes, no experience in journalism, and I've only been watching soccer for a little over two years.  But I figure I'll never really know if I don't try.  So this is my experiment to see if I can write something that I would ever considering submitting for publication.  I honestly don't think it will ever to come to that, but if nothing else comes of it I still think it will be fun.

So what can you expect from future posts?  The fun part of this is, I really don't even know yet.  I plan to write about the things I already love about soccer as well as the things I'm continuing to learn.  I will probably include things like what beer to drink when watching a given soccer game, the best and worst haircuts and facial hair in soccer, my dream soccer trips, maybe even my fashion dos and don'ts of soccer.

To end my first post, here's some basic information that will likely come up in future posts:

My favorite MLS team: Philadelphia Union (hence the regular trips to Chester, PA).  They're my local team, and they may be far from the best team in MLS, but they show a lot of heart and they can be really exciting to watch.  I always say that the Union can make something out of nothing and they can also make nothing out of something. 
My favorite European club team: Two-way tie between Barcelona and Manchester City.  I love Barcelona because they're basically the club version of the Spanish national team (see below for that explanation).  On the other hand, I love Manchester City because you never really know what you're going to get when you watch them.  Are you going to get Mario Balotelli doing something crazy? something amazing?  Something crazy AND something amazing?  Carlos Tevez getting carded for diving when he should have been awarded a penalty kick? Two goals in extra time to beat a team that they should have buried at least 3-0?  It's exciting.  It's dramatic. It's fun.  What more can you ask for when you turn on a soccer game?
My favorite national team: I'm American, so I'm kind of obligated to say the U.S. Men's National Team (USMNT), but to me, the way Spain plays is the epitome of the "beautiful game".
My least favorite MLS team: Colorado Rapids.  This is probably all about the timing of when I got into MLS - near the end of the 2010 season.  When the playoffs came around, I really got behind FC Dallas after watching them cream the LA Galaxy, only to watch them fall to Colorado Rapids in the most unceremonious fashion: an own goal.  They also just play a bit too physical and aggressive for my liking, and I feel that they have a very unfair homefield advantage compared to other teams because of the elevation. 
My least favorite national team: Netherlands.  Similar to Colorado, after watching them in the 2010 World Cup my impression of them is that they play dirty.  They made the World Cup final ugly to watch by committing fouls when they couldn't compete with Spain's beautiful game.